Dokumentaatio

ostem_xs hiossen_XS

 

 

OSSTEM IMPLANT SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VOL 5. (pdf)

Publications from 2009-2011.

 

OSSTEM IMPLANT SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VOL 4. (pdf)

Publications from 2004-2009.

 

OSSTEM IMPLANT SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VOL 3. (pdf)

Publications from 1999-2008.

 

OSSTEM IMPLANT SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VOL 2. (pdf)

Publications from 2005-2007.

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

Osstes study thumbnail

 

1 year trial. Comparing two types non-submerged dental implants.pdf

Results: This study showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in peak insertion torque (P 1⁄4 0.009) and ISQ (P 1⁄4 0.003) but not in PTV (P 1⁄4 0.097) at surgery. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in the pattern of change of ISQ during the 10 weeks after surgery (P 1⁄4 0.339). For marginal bone loss, no significant difference was observed between the control and the experimental groups before functional loading (P 1⁄4 0.624), but after 1 year of follow-up, a borderline difference was observed (P 1⁄4 0.048).
July 26, 2009

 

 

1 year prospective Clinical Study Soft Tissue Conditions Flapless Implant Surgery.pdf

Results: None of the implants were lost during follow-up, giving a success rate of 100%. The mean probing depth was 17 18 2.1 mm (SD 0.7), and the average bleeding on probing index was 0.1 (SD 0.3). The average gingival index score was 18 19 0.1 (SD 0.3), and the mean marginal bone loss was 0.3 mm (SD 0.4 mm; range 0.0-1.1 mm). Ten implants exhibited 19 20 bone loss of 1.0 mm, whereas 125 implants experienced no bone loss at all.
April 29, 2010

 

Analysis of factors affecting crestal bone loss around the implants.pdf

Results: At least 332 out of 346 (96%) installed GS implants were successfully osseointegrated 1 year after prostheses were first set. The mean value of the bone resorption of the installed GS implants was 0.44mm. The minimum value was 0mm, and the maximum value, 2.85mm. There was a statistically significant difference between the implantation methods (submerged, non-submerged) with regard to the amount of alveolar bone loss 1 year after prostheses were first set (p<0.05). Non-submerged implants showed less crestal bone loss. Note, however, that other variables had no correlation with crestal bone loss (p>0.05).
September 28, 2009

 

Evaluation of peri-implant tissue in nonsubmerged dental implants a multicenter retrospective study. pdf

Results: After a mean follow-up period of 30 months, the mean crestal bone resorption in 339 implants was 0.43 mm. The survival and success rates were observed to be 99.1% and 95.1%, respectively. The mean calculus, inflammatory, and plaque indices were 0.13, 0.37, and 0.73, respectively, and the mean width of buccal keratinized mucosa was observed to be 2.43 mm.
April 29, 2010

 


 

 

Lisää tutkimuksiä löytyy valmistajan sivuilta (linkki).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Järjestä: Nimi / Hinta